Trauma Monthly

Published by: Kowsar
Corrected Proof scheduled for 24 (1)

The Effect of Frontal Lobe Traumatic Brain Injury on Sentence Comprehension and Working Memory

Ehsan Hemmati 1 , Zahra Ghayoumi-Anaraki 2 , Mohammad Reza Ehsaei 3 and Leila Ghasisin 4 , *
Authors Information
1 Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad , Iran
4 Communication Disorder Research Center, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Trauma Monthly: In Press (In Press); e74353
  • Published Online: September 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 6, 2018
  • Revised: June 30, 2018
  • Accepted: July 7, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.74353

To Cite: Hemmati E, Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z, Ehsaei M R, Ghasisin L. The Effect of Frontal Lobe Traumatic Brain Injury on Sentence Comprehension and Working Memory, Trauma Mon. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e74353. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.74353.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Savage CR, Deckersbach T, Heckers S, Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Alpert NM, et al. Prefrontal regions supporting spontaneous and directed application of verbal learning strategies: evidence from PET. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 1):219-31. [PubMed: 11133799].
  • 2. Miotto EC, Evans JJ, de Lucia MC, Scaff M. Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction: a controlled trial of an attention and problem solving treatment group. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(4):517-40. doi: 10.1080/09602010802332108. [PubMed: 18766984].
  • 3. Kohler S, Paus T, Buckner RL, Milner B. Effects of left inferior prefrontal stimulation on episodic memory formation: a two-stage fMRI-rTMS study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16(2):178-88. doi: 10.1162/089892904322984490. [PubMed: 15068590].
  • 4. Fletcher PC, Henson RN. Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 5):849-81. [PubMed: 11335690].
  • 5. Volpato C, Piccione F, Silvoni S, Cavinato M, Palmieri A, Meneghello F, et al. Working memory in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: auditory event-related potentials and neuropsychological evidence. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;27(3):198-206. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181e0aa14. [PubMed: 20461012].
  • 6. Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Simmons A, Brammer M, Williams SC, Giampietro V, et al. Word retrieval in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 7):1507-17. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh170. [PubMed: 15163610].
  • 7. Friederici AD, Hahne A, Saddy D. Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. J Psycholinguist Res. 2002;31(1):45-63. [PubMed: 11924839].
  • 8. Peach R, Shapiro L. Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach. Elsevier Mosby; 2012.
  • 9. Murdoch BE, Theodoros DG. Traumatic brain injury: Associated speech, language, and swallowing disorders. Cengage Learning; 2001.
  • 10. Friedmann N, Gvion A. Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: a dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation. Brain Lang. 2003;86(1):23-39. [PubMed: 12821413].
  • 11. Hoskison MM, Moore AN, Hu B, Orsi S, Kobori N, Dash PK. Persistent working memory dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: evidence for a time-dependent mechanism. Neuroscience. 2009;159(2):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.050. [PubMed: 19167462]. [PubMed Central: PMC4264540].
  • 12. Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol Rev. 1998;105(1):158-73. [PubMed: 9450375].
  • 13. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(11):417-23. [PubMed: 11058819].
  • 14. Honan CA, McDonald S, Gowland A, Fisher A, Randall RK. Deficits in comprehension of speech acts after TBI: The role of theory of mind and executive function. Brain Lang. 2015;150:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.007. [PubMed: 26335998].
  • 15. van der Naalt J, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: the predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(2):207-13. [PubMed: 10071101]. [PubMed Central: PMC1736194].
  • 16. Barman A, Chatterjee A, Bhide R. Cognitive Impairment and Rehabilitation Strategies After Traumatic Brain Injury. Indian J Psychol Med. 2016;38(3):172-81. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.183086. [PubMed: 27335510]. [PubMed Central: PMC4904751].
  • 17. McKee AC, Daneshvar DH. The neuropathology of traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:45-66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00004-0. [PubMed: 25702209]. [PubMed Central: PMC4694720].
  • 18. Nilipour R, Pourshahbaz A, Ghoreyshi ZS. Reliability and Validity of Bedside Version of Persian WAB (P-WAB-1). Basic Clin Neurosci. 2014;5(4):253-8. [PubMed: 27284389]. [PubMed Central: PMC4656930].
  • 19. Hartikainen KM, Waljas M, Isoviita T, Dastidar P, Liimatainen S, Solbakk AK, et al. Persistent symptoms in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury associated with executive dysfunction. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32(7):767-74. doi: 10.1080/13803390903521000. [PubMed: 20198531].
  • 20. Paradis M, Paribakhat T, Nilipour R. Bilingual Aphasia Test (Farsi Version). Hilsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1987.
  • 21. Comrie B. Windfuhr GL, editor. The World's major languages. Routledge; 2009. p. 445-59.
  • 22. Shebani MF, van de Vljver FJ, Poortinga YH. A strict test of the phonological loop hypothesis with Libyan data. Mem Cognit. 2005;33(2):196-202. [PubMed: 16028574].
  • 23. Chen YN, Mitra S, Schlaghecken F. Sub-processes of working memory in the N-back task: an investigation using ERPs. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(7):1546-59. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.003. [PubMed: 18448388].
  • 24. Matzke M, Mai H, Nager W, Russeler J, Munte T. The costs of freedom: an ERP -- study of non-canonical sentences. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(6):844-52. [PubMed: 12048043].
  • 25. Friederici AD, Meyer M, von Cramon DY. Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain Lang. 2000;74(2):289-300. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2313. [PubMed: 10950920].
  • 26. Newman SD, Malaia E, Seo R, Cheng H. The effect of individual differences in working memory capacity on sentence comprehension: an FMRI study. Brain Topogr. 2013;26(3):458-67. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0264-8. [PubMed: 23124385]. [PubMed Central: PMC3802527].
  • 27. Baddeley A. Working memory and language: an overview. J Commun Disord. 2003;36(3):189-208. [PubMed: 12742667].
  • 28. Vallat-Azouvi C, Weber T, Legrand L, Azouvi P. Working memory after severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13(5):770-80. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070993. [PubMed: 17697408].
  • 29. Hester RL, Kinsella GJ, Ong B. Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(4):475-81. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704104037. [PubMed: 15327726].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments