Trauma Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

The Impact of Psychological Factors on Device Removal Surgery

Mohammadreza Golbakhsh 1 , Mirmostafa Sadaat 1 , Fatemeh Noughani 2 , Ahmadreza Mirbolook 3 , * , Amirmohammad Gholizadeh 4 and Sadegh Abedi 4
Authors Information
1 Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Departmant of Psychology, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
4 Medical Faculty, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
Article information
  • Trauma Monthly: May 01, 2016, 21 (2); e25871
  • Published Online: May 8, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 6, 2014
  • Revised: October 12, 2015
  • Accepted: October 17, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.25871

To Cite: Golbakhsh M, Sadaat M, Noughani F, Mirbolook A, Gholizadeh A, et al. The Impact of Psychological Factors on Device Removal Surgery, Trauma Mon. 2016 ; 21(2):e25871. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.25871.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Trauma Monthly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123(2-3): 74-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(9): 1906-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma. 1996; 41(5): 846-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Beaupre GS, Csongradi JJ. Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10(2): 87-92[PubMed]
  • 6. Derogatis LR, Savitz KL. Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings. 2000;
  • 7. D'Eon JL, Harris CA, Ellis JA. Testing factorial validity and gender invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale. J Behav Med. 2004; 27(4): 361-72[PubMed]
  • 8. Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002; 96(3): 319-24[PubMed]
  • 9. Davison BL. Refracture following plate removal in supracondylar-intercondylar femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2003; 26(2): 157-9[PubMed]
  • 10. Ochs BG, Gonser CE, Baron HC, Stockle U, Badke A, Stuby FM. [Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication?]. Unfallchirurg. 2012; 115(4): 323-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Brown OL, Dirschl DR, Obremskey WT. Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(4): 271-4[PubMed]
  • 12. Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchhoff S, Sprecher CM, Ockert B, Fischer F, et al. Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 138[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments