Trauma Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

The Impact of Psychological Factors on Device Removal Surgery

Mohammadreza Golbakhsh 1 , Mirmostafa Sadaat 1 , Fatemeh Noughani 2 , Ahmadreza Mirbolook 3 , * , Amirmohammad Gholizadeh 4 and Sadegh Abedi 4
Authors Information
1 Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Departmant of Psychology, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
4 Medical Faculty, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IR Iran
Article information
  • Trauma Monthly: May 01, 2016, 21 (2); e25871
  • Published Online: May 8, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 6, 2014
  • Revised: October 12, 2015
  • Accepted: October 17, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.25871

To Cite: Golbakhsh M, Sadaat M, Noughani F, Mirbolook A, Gholizadeh A, et al. The Impact of Psychological Factors on Device Removal Surgery, Trauma Mon. 2016 ; 21(2):e25871. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.25871.

Copyright © 2016, Trauma Monthly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123(2-3): 74-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(9): 1906-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma. 1996; 41(5): 846-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Beaupre GS, Csongradi JJ. Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10(2): 87-92[PubMed]
  • 6. Derogatis LR, Savitz KL. Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings. 2000;
  • 7. D'Eon JL, Harris CA, Ellis JA. Testing factorial validity and gender invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale. J Behav Med. 2004; 27(4): 361-72[PubMed]
  • 8. Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002; 96(3): 319-24[PubMed]
  • 9. Davison BL. Refracture following plate removal in supracondylar-intercondylar femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2003; 26(2): 157-9[PubMed]
  • 10. Ochs BG, Gonser CE, Baron HC, Stockle U, Badke A, Stuby FM. [Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication?]. Unfallchirurg. 2012; 115(4): 323-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Brown OL, Dirschl DR, Obremskey WT. Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(4): 271-4[PubMed]
  • 12. Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchhoff S, Sprecher CM, Ockert B, Fischer F, et al. Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 138[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments