Psychometric Properties of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in Iranian Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors Information
Article Notes and Dates
To Cite : Dehnadi-Moghadam A, Rezaei S, Khodadadi N, Rahmatpour P. Psychometric Properties of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in Iranian Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury, Trauma Mon. 2017 ;22(1):e25534. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.25534.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, Murray LJ, Cooper DJ, Cameron PA. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011; 42(3): 281-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen AJ, Farace E, Habbema JD, Marshall LF, et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(4): 666-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. McGarry LJ, Thompson D, Millham FH, Cowell L, Snyder PJ, Lenderking WR, et al. Outcomes and costs of acute treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2002; 53(6): 1152-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011; 113(6): 435-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79(3): 235-40[PubMed]
  • 6. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Including the FIM™ instrument). Version 5.1. . 1997;
  • 7. Hershkovitz A, Kalandariov Z, Hermush V, Weiss R, Brill S. Factors affecting short-term rehabilitation outcomes of disabled elderly patients with proximal hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(7): 916-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74(5): 531-6[PubMed]
  • 9. Young Y, Fan MY, Hebel JR, Boult C. Concurrent validity of administering the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument by interview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88(9): 766-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15(3): 311-9[PubMed]
  • 11. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75(2): 133-43[PubMed]
  • 12. Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78(8): 828-34[PubMed]
  • 13. Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L, Lopez E, Wehman P, Kreutzer JS, Englander J, et al. Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78(2): 125-31[PubMed]
  • 14. Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleisig Y, Zeilig G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(3): 342-5[PubMed]
  • 15. Yousefzadeh Chabok S, Ramezani S, Kouchakinejad L, Saneei Z. Epidemiology of pediatric head trauma in guilan. Arch Trauma Res. 2012; 1(1): 19-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Rezaei S, Dehnadi Moghadam A, khodadadi N, Rahmatpour P, Salehpour GH. Prediction of Motor and Cognitive Outcome in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Length of Hospital stay, Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS), Mental Status and Substance Abuse: A Case Study of Emergency and Neurosurgery Section in Rasht Poursina Hospital. J Iranian Sci Anesthesiol Intens Care. 2013; 82(2): 24-35
  • 17. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979; 60(1): 14-7[PubMed]
  • 18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3): 189-98[PubMed]
  • 19. Ware JJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6): 473-83[PubMed]
  • 20. Guilfoyle MR, Seeley HM, Corteen E, Harkin C, Richards H, Menon DK, et al. Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey. J Neurotrauma. 2010; 27(12): 2173-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 2000; : 93-101
  • 22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 1994; : 246
  • 23. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2)-20[PubMed]
  • 24. Crocker T, Young J, Forster A, Brown L, Ozer S, Greenwood DC. The effect of physical rehabilitation on activities of daily living in older residents of long-term care facilities: systematic review with meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2013; 42(6): 682-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Dankner R, Ring H, Dolgopiat M, Barell V, et al. Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients after a first stroke: effect of cognitive status at admission on the functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(6): 742-9[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiaion Alert via Google Reader

Cited By:

Trauma Monthly accepts terms & conditions of:

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Citedby Linking DOI enabled Crossref iThenticate COPE Cross Check